October 23, 2009

Roundup on the Vatican and Anglican "personal ordinariates"

by Steve Thorngate

Tuesday, the Catholic Church announced a new canonical structure via which disaffected conservative Anglican priests, laypeople and entire groups can enter full communion with the Catholic Church. Below are some highlights of the week’s extensive coverage and commentary.

Ruth Gledhill posts video of the joint press conference by Rowan Williams, archbishop of Canterbury and head of the Anglican Communion, and Vincent Nichols, Catholic archbishop of Westminster. Paul Vallely offers a helpful what-does-this-mean FAQ, and Kendall Harmon and Andrew McGowan each provides insightful big-picture analysis. Bosco Peters gets into some of the practical issues for priests, while CCblogger Chris Sissons looks at the broader story for ecumenism.

In the Church of England, the news has serious implications for the ongoing debate over women bishops. Already this weekend, a large gathering of clergy on the “opposed” side--members of Forward in Faith, which welcomed the Vatican’s move--will meet in London to discuss options. John Chilton goes so far as to suggest that Rome’s real purpose here is to give traditionalists leverage in that debate.

Andrew Brown is critical as well but focuses on the expanded and diversified body of priests the Catholic Church stands to gain. C of E priest Doug Chapin, frustrated by Williams’s timid performance at the press conference, offers “what Rowan should have said.” Meanwhile, Edwin Barnes, bishop emeritus of Richborough, insists that those who do leave should take with them their churches and vicarages.

Elsewhere, it’s less certain how much of an impact all this will have. The Vatican’s move didn’t come out of nowhere; it was in part the result of efforts by conservative Anglo-Catholics, most notably Australian John Hepworth of the 400,000-strong Traditional Anglican Communion--which, like FiF, expressed wholehearted joy at the news and is already moving toward taking Rome up on the offer.

Responses from other conservative Anglicans, however, have been more muted. Rod Thomas, of conservative C of E group Reform, sees more promise in emerging conservative Anglican bodies than in Rome. Here in the States, conservative Anglican leaders have been similarly measured. And Scott Baldauf gives a good overview of the complicated situation among the African Anglican churches, where the archbishops of Kenya and Uganda have each indicated that becoming Catholic is a nonstarter. The common thread, as Gary Stern details, is that most conservative Anglicans aren’t hurting for ecclesial options right now.

Diana Butler Bass doesn’t see much of a story here either, pointing out that “in western Christianity, religious switching is a way of life.” What’s more, welcoming former Episcopal priests into the Catholic priesthood isn’t new; in the States it’s been going on for 25 years, though, as Catholic columnist Dan Rodricks observes, Tuesday’s decision will streamline the process--and help with the priest shortage. Thomas Reese foresees the Catholic Church revolutionized by a “steady supply of married priests.”

Other notable Catholic-oriented pieces include Rocco Palmo’s post emphasizing, somewhat counterintuitively, the church’s ecumenical sensitivity, and Francis Rocca’s overview of Catholicism’s growing “liturgical smorgasbord.”

Last and perhaps least, the parodies. Gregory Beyer crafts a pitch e-mail from the Vatican to individual Anglicans, Chris Hansen (via The Lead) imagines a second press conference, and the somewhat more freewheeling Adrian Worsfold offers a fairly ridiculous news writeup.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

You mean the ROMAN Catholic Church???????????????????????? It is irresponsible to use 'the Catholic Church' in order to refer to the Church of Rome! Then why not use the Nicene standard and say, the "one, holy, catholic and apostolic church"! Most western writers are pretty ignorant and insensitive about traditions.

Steve Thorngate said...

Since I responded to a similar comment (from an identically named commenter!) yesterday, I'll just paste in my response: I understand your point, but I don't think it's as clear-cut as you suggest. For one, there's a pejorative history attached to the Protestant use of the word "Roman" in this way. More fundamentally, I use "Catholic Church" for the same reason I use "Orthodox Church" or "True Jesus Church" or, for that matter, "Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood"--while I disagree with the name's exclusivist implications, it's still respectful and appropriate to call an established group the same thing it calls itself.

Anonymous said...

Well, tomorrow is supposed to be Reformation Sunday - whatever that may mean to the Reformed denominations.For the rest, it is another Sunday. It is time that we re-examine why the Europeans disfigured the "true Jesus Church" with schisms, reformation/counter-reformation, Popes, Anglicans/Episcopalians, Luther, Calvin, Knox, Chalmers, Wesley-brothers, Quakers, Christian Scientists, Trinitarians, Unitarians,Pentecostals, Witnesses, Charismatics,theologies of all types..........Now aren't we stressed out by the influx of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists into our once serene spiritual landscape?

Pastor Dan said...

It looks like you have a great site here. I will be checking back often.

Once again great site, and great writing.

God Bless,

Pastor Dan

Peter Carey+ said...

Steve,
Thanks for this news roundup, very helpful. I would be interested in hearing more about what the CCBloggers and others who write for CC have to say about the discussion about the use of the term Roman Catholic. I think your rationale for using the term Catholic Church is a sound one, but I would love to hear how other people view, and use the term Catholic (big "C" as well as little "c").

Thanks for this post, and for encouraging the conversation!

Blessings,

Peter Carey+

Anonymous said...

We need a very sincere, penitent prayer of confession for the absurd ways how the new-convert Constantine and his faithful followers damaged the church and forever messed up that gentle but radical thing called the Good News of Jesus, the Messiah with their well-planned, at times even disgustingly very biblical, devices such as unholy crusades, mission disguised in colonialism, sugar-coated apartheid, blatantly brutal slavery of those gave us the spirituals, and now all these cerebral work-out on unity and ecumenical gymnastic.

Anonymous said...

The pope's offer is an insult to clergywomen and gay men and women in ministry, and it is opportunistic sheep stealing no matter how they try to dress it up. While some are feeling old wounds ripped open once again, others are congratulating the pope on his openness. I don't understand why everyone is going so easy on him.

Post a Comment

We don't currently require registration, but we do prefer that you include your name. If you don't have any of the login types listed in the pulldown menu, select "Name/URL"--the URL field is optional, so leave it blank if you don't want to hyperlink your name to another site.