by Tom Steagald
Most Christian congregations confess that the faithful—and, we should hope, even the unfaithful—are saved by “grace alone.” In fact, like the foolish Galatians, we have turned to a different gospel. What we really believe—individually and corporately, spiritually and pastorally, vocationally and ecclesiologically—is that salvation (read “success”) is the result of “work alone.” Or if not work alone, then work mostly, which, unlike grace and faith, produces measurable results and therefore testifies one way or the other to a minister’s effectiveness or a congregation’s vitality.
One practical consequence of this theological eclipse is easy to observe: how many of the mailings filling pastors’ inboxes are selling techniques? The latest products for programming? Some new skill set that will increase attendance, engender enthusiasm, generate giving?
Eugene Peterson laments our temptation and tendency to substitute technique for spirituality. One result is impatience: we have to get busy! Another is fear: if we don’t do this now, the church down the road will do it, and we'll be left behind. Yet a third result is the kind of frustrated and often quixotic jumps pastors make from church to church when a new building, staff, program or pulpit/platform seems more amenable to their goals. These idolatries and self-deceptions prompt Peterson to encourage pastors to cultivate a spirituality of both place and incarnational patience.
I should disclose that I recently received a nice "promotion." In my new pastorate—where I'm thankful to be and thrilled to pitch my tent—I've been trying to locate and avoid the traps set for all ministers. Here’s one: even well-meaning congregations often believe they will be saved not just by work, but by the work of the pastor: her preaching and personality, his pastoral care and visitation, the winsomeness and marketing and programming that will change the old First Church from “inglory” into glory.
We in the trade are prone to lament our congregations’ unrealistic, unyielding and even idolatrous expectations. But I suspect that secretly we are flattered by it all. For all our protestations, the most dangerous trap is one we set for ourselves: many of us desperately want our people to be dependent on us, want the flock to turn to us in every little crisis to solve every problem and sign off on every decision. Their high regard can assuage our insecurities. It can seem to validate the call and reward the sacrifice. John Baillie identified this pastoral neurosis for what it was when he confessed that his "care of others" was often simply a "refined" form of self-care.
As I start work in a new place I think of the Baptizer’s benediction: “I must decrease and He must increase.” What does salvation by grace alone look like in the local church?
Tom Steagald is a United Methodist pastor in Shelby, North Carolina. He's a contributor to Feasting on the Word (Westminster John Knox), and blogs at Prayer Pilgrimage.
November 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
25 + years ago I had a seminary prof tell me that he thought more people were converted to the pastor than to Jesus. A great post Tom! Thanks!
Salvation and church success are two different things. Christ redeemed the church -- universal, not granular -- and the pruning of any particular unproductive branch is, if anything, a part of the salvation process. Applying salvation scriptures to congregational success is mildly clever but theologically irrelevant.
Dear Tom: This particular blog is both insightful and accurate --at least as far as my ministry and many colleagues' is concerned. Ok recognition--got it! Now-- how to avoid this deceptively seductive pot hole? Also what you did not say is that we pastors often set up unreal expectations and then scramble to meet them. Yikes. I love what I do (second career pastor)...but burn out is just around the corner. I think this is important-- perhaps this is not theologically relevant (see above), but if all theology is incarnational --and I think it is then your observations are not only relevant, but important for those of us in ministry.
Amen brother. I enjoyed your article and believe this issue to be a great challenge for all of us in the pews and in the pulpits. A friend used to call it the conspiracy between the laity and ordained to thrust the work, and presumably the work of salvation, onto the ordained. It tends to relieve the congregation of their responsibility and satisfy the pastors need to be in charge.
It seems many of us in ordained ministry are drawn to the "work" out of a need to be needed or at least a need to help. With insight and God's help, hopefully we can recognize that part of us and put it in its proper place. Then it becomes a matter of balancing doing too much and doing too little.
While I cringe at the notion of salvation by the pastor, we are a very present and visible model of behavior and theology at work. Shouldn't we model salvation by grace, and tend to the work as a natural extension of our salvation? Thanks again for an engaging article on a difficult subject.
Dr. Cromack. Rev Townsend--Please go to the following link where I speak to the issue of expectations
http://theolog.org/2009/02/blogging-toward-sunday-all-things-to.html
Post a Comment
We don't currently require registration, but we do prefer that you include your name. If you don't have any of the login types listed in the pulldown menu, select "Name/URL"--the URL field is optional, so leave it blank if you don't want to hyperlink your name to another site.