by David Henson
In the film The Incredibles, a young superhero bemoans the fact that he must hide his superior speed when he's with his peers—he believes it’s the one thing that makes him special. His mother, also endowed with supernatural abilities, tries to placate him: “Everyone’s special, Dash.”
To which Dash mumbles, “That’s just another way of saying no one is.”
Sometimes I wonder if a similar line of reasoning runs through much of Christianity’s understanding of Jesus’ command to love one’s neighbor. Until recently, I viewed all of humanity as my neighbor, from the poorest of the poor in the developing world to the richest of the rich on Wall Street. But lately I’ve been wondering whether we’ve so globalized and overspiritualized this commandment that it’s become meaningless. Everyone’s my neighbor? That’s just another way of saying no one is.
More to the point, I suspect that many of us, myself included, substitute this globalized, aloof neighbor love for actual self-sacrificial love in our lives. I cheer for the right international causes—Amnesty International, the Red Cross and so on—and dutifully make out my checks. When tragedy befalls a nation, such as the recent devastating earthquake in Haiti, I'm quick to make a donation.
But too many times these donations rise from a sappy place of sentimentality rather than a sacred space of altruism. I wonder how many of us, if we are brutally honest, give not to help those in need so much as to make ourselves feel better in the face of our powerlessness to end the world’s injustice.
I for one find it easiest to give to faraway causes and tragedies, because it requires so little of me. I rush to help when tragedy befalls my neighbors in Haiti, but I can’t be bothered to help fight child hunger in my home state—after all, the latter might cost me something more than money. I love "my neighbors in Haiti" so I don't have to love my actual neighbors. Yet each street, city, state and region has more than enough human tragedy that needs to be confronted with compassion.
I recently moved to Texas, where I was struck that a state that so heavily identifies with Christianity—where churches outnumber, well, everything—can have such irresponsible rates of childhood hunger and poverty. These are my neighbors living in the midst of human tragedy, and it is a tragedy I can touch, a tragedy that I can let touch me and change me. It’s a tragedy that I can stand in solidarity against with my neighbors.
It may be time to start loving my neighbors in my very own neighborhood. Perhaps then the next time Jesus asks who my neighbor is, I can answer with a name.
David Henson is a stay-at-home parent and heretical blogger (part of the CCblogs network) who learned how to ask oddball questions from his chatterbox two-year-old.
2 comments:
Whether to recognize our neighbors as those in close proximity or the myriad related through our commonality as global residents need not be an either/or dilemma. They are all children of God, and therefore, our neighbors. David Henson makes a valid point in surmising that many people may give monetary assistance to assuage their own feelings of guilt or prop up their magnanimous self images with little expended effort. However,those who are in the trenches actually assisting people in need are still able to do much more because of the resources that the distant "servant-hands" provide. An appropriate solution is a balanced approach in which each of us commits to serving a wide variety of neighbors on all levels (locally, regionally and globally)in as direct a manner as possible.
Rev Mama Cass,
I think you pinpoint the weakness of the argument, when it is laid out this way. It does set up a false dichotomy. But, I do wonder if children of God and neighbors are mutually inclusive. Certainly, globalization makes it impossible to separate them entirely, but I can't help but think that when Jesus spoke of loving neighbors, his application was much more localized than ours, in that the boundaries that it toppled were ones that he could reach out and touch, and ones that transformed all parties involved.
You are right that balanced approach is the best approach. Unfortunately, I have seen more churches in my days as a religion reporter do very little for there actual neighbors and focus instead on international neighbors. Perhaps this is an appropriate response, but it just seems, well, safe. Which is why I prefer it, personally. So, this post might suggest an over-corrective, but maybe a necessary one.
Elsewhere, I have suggested a Lenten fast from giving to Haiti, recognizing that a) such giving is warranted, b) aid organizations, generally, are flush with donations right now and don't need them immediately, and c) giving won't change the situation and should, at the least, be coupled with advocacy for a more just treatment of Haiti vis a vis international debt and sweatshop exploitation.
The irony, of course, with using Disney at the beginning of this post is that Disney has a history in Haiti that isn't too magical.
Post a Comment
We don't currently require registration, but we do prefer that you include your name. If you don't have any of the login types listed in the pulldown menu, select "Name/URL"--the URL field is optional, so leave it blank if you don't want to hyperlink your name to another site.