by Steve Thorngate
In a recent post, I highlighted the decision some pro-LGBT pastors have made to get out of the civil marriage business entirely—what they can’t do for same-sex couples they won’t do for anyone.
It seems the logic works in both directions: you can also avoid doing something for same-sex couples by refusing to do it for anyone. The Catholic Archdiocese of Washington has long been in conflict with the District of Columbia over the latter’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage, effective yesterday. This week Catholic Charities DC, which provides social services in the district as a city contractor, announced that it will evade the issue of health insurance for employees’ same-sex spouses by declining to offer it to spouses generally.
My first reaction was to marvel that an organization that promotes health care for all would go out of its way to deny care to its own employees’ families. Of course, that’s a bit of a rhetorical pivot; obviously they see this as a separate issue from health care. Bryan Cones highlights a more relevant irony: Catholic Charities DC is defending the abstract “institution of marriage” by making things harder on actual married people.
Cones also points to the more creative and expansive solution pursued by the Archdiocese of San Francisco. I’ll add only that this conflict would be largely defused if our culture had a shared understanding that civil marriage rights have nothing to do with religion.
March 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Note: this also refers to the earlier post about civil unions and same sex marriages.
It seems to me an effective “Street Theater” protest needs to highlight the intertwining of church and state without referencing marriage.
Hence, a series of ballot propositions needs to be started (in states which allow such actions) which say a fee needs to be levied on the rights of initiation in all religious institutions. Hence, is a Baptism being performed? The ballot proposition would propose that you need to get a license and pay a fee. If it is a circumcision? Get a license and pay a fee. Confirmation, Bar or bat mitzvah? Get a license and pay a fee.
Further, the propositions needs to ban gays from these rites and sacrament.
The Street Theater aspect of this would be immediately evident. The state is interfering with the church. The state does not tell churches who we Baptize or Confirm or charge a fee for those services or regulate them. But it does for marriage. So, why stop there?
Joe Connolly
Post a Comment
We don't currently require registration, but we do prefer that you include your name. If you don't have any of the login types listed in the pulldown menu, select "Name/URL"--the URL field is optional, so leave it blank if you don't want to hyperlink your name to another site.